The Muir Building, the perfect example of what Downtown faces
About a month ago, it was published in the El Paso Times and in the El Paso Inc that the current owners of the Muir Building want to tear it down. As you might have guessed this has already stirred the pot between historians and developers:
- Ep Times: Investors, retailer want remake two blocks.
- El Paso Inc: Owners want to tear down Trost Building.
I had kind of forgotten about it, but as luck would have it I came across a blog post from the TimeTravelNow Blog. It had a picture of the Muir building from about the 1950s:
This happy bustling scene is a sharp contrast to what the location looks like now:
It got me thinking a bit. That contrast highlights the challenges that we’ll face in the coming years as we try to wrestle back vibrancy to our downtown after years of neglect. We have had a few redevelopment shining stars, namely the Plaza Theater and the recent Mills Building remodels. My fear is that like the Muir building, much of our historic buildings are to far gone to salvage.
City council has moved forward with the historic decision to approve the destruction of city hall to make way for a AAA baseball stadium. El Paso will soon be facing some serious development vs. cultural vs. design aesthetic choices to make. Right next to City Hall are some significant historic buildings like the Scottish Rite Temple. There are many more behind it, in the Old San Francisco Historic District. Will the historic guidelines the city has established for the area hold true? Does it apply to the design of the Stadium?
The great beast ASARCO has already been slain and the government is winding up its far reaching public corruption scandal. Downtown development is our next great battle royal and the factions are lining up to take sides. Break out the popcorn, this will be a fun fight to watch.
Update (10/10/2012): the El Paso Inc has a updated article regarding this issue, check it out here: Preservation vs. Progress by Robert Grey
Update (11/13/2012): KVIA is reporting that the council has reversed an earlier decision and decided to let the building be demolished